![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Home Welcome MODULES Relevant and Additional Resources Feedback Copyright Disclaimer |
|
||||||||||||||||
iv. Screening and assessment for dementiaAimsThe aims of this content focus area are to:
OutcomesBy the end of this content focus area, participants will be able to:
Screening and assessment for dementiaThe screening and assessment of dementia is complex and, as such, is often most effective when:
Information that is commonly collected as part of an assessment includes:
Physical health status: Cognitive and related functioning: A tool that is often used to screen for cognitive impairment is the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The MMSE is well known across health disciplines having been used for many years. As such, there is considerable evidence supporting both the validity and reliability of this tool. However, its diagnostic usefulness relative to more recently developed tools has been called into question (see Brodaty, Low, Gibson & Burns, 2006). Several other tests can also be used to assess different areas of cognitive function, including, but by no means limited to: Commonly, people who are suspected of having cognitive impairment undergo a "battery" (or set) of tests that investigate a range of cognitive and related abilities (e.g., language, socio-emotional functioning). It is difficult to recommend a set of screening tools for the recognition of dementia that would be suitable for all clients in all situations. For example, in Indigenous communities in Australia, the KICA assessment tool has been shown to be useful. However, concerns have been raised that some of the symbols used in this test are not entirely meaningful or culturally relevant for older Indigenous people in certain areas of Australia (Department of Western Australia Country Health Service Kimberley, 2006). In addition, the RUDAS scale (Storey, Rowland, Confort, & Dickson, 2004) has been shown to be useful in cognitive screening and assessment of people from CALD (culturally and linguistically diverse) backgrounds. Finally, the GP-Cog is a suitable and validated tool for use by General Practitioners (GPs)-however, it is not well validated for use by other health care professionals (Brodaty, Low, Gibson, & Burns, 2006). Activity 4
Final note: Although there are many cognitive tests mentioned in the literature, it is important to be aware that not all are valid and/or reliable. All screening and assessment must be conducted by health care practitioners who: (a) are appropriately trained in the use of the tool/test; (b) apply the principles of assessment discussed earlier in this module-including the need for impeccable history taking; and (c) have an appreciation of clinical diagnosis and subsequent implications for the person being tested.
| ||||||||||||||
|